Case library
Nevada family-law decisions, briefed for practice.
Practitioner summaries with key holdings, posture, disposition, and the statutes cited - up front, where you need them. Every summary links to the full opinion.
Case Library = case briefs of the decisions themselves. For long-form explainers of the governing law, Guides; for the exact quotable passages, verified verbatim, the Canon.
7 results for “NRS 125.010”
FASSARI VS. FASSARI (FAMILY)
Oct 23, 202525-46389 · 90183-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.**Standard of review.** The court reviewed the district court's determination of personal jurisdiction de novo, citing Fulbright & Jaworski LLP v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 131 Nev. 30, 35, 342 P.3d 997, 1001 (2015). It…
DAVIDSON VS. DAVIDSON
Sep 29, 2016132 Nev. Adv. Op. 71 (2016) · 67698 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed.Standard of review: Questions of statutory construction are reviewed de novo. I. Cox Constr. Co. v. CH2 Invs., LLC, 129 Nev. 139, 142, 296 P.3d 1202, 1203 (2013). Appellate jurisdiction: The Court first held that the…
ISSARESCU VS. ISSARESCU (DIVORCE)
Jun 8, 196682 Nev. 239, 415 P.2d 67 (1966) · 5031 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed. ("Affirmed.")Thompson, J. The husband appealed a decree granting the wife a divorce on the ground of three years' separation without cohabitation, contending there was no explicit evidence that the separation was voluntary and with…
FAUSONE VS. FAUSONE (DIVORCE PROPERTY & ALIMONY)
Apr 21, 195975 Nev. 222, 338 P.2d 68 (1959) · 4138 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. The judgment of divorce in favor of the husband was affirmed; the portions of the judgment denying the wife alimony were reversed and the case remanded with instructions to amend the judgment to provide a reasonable amount for the wife's support. Costs to appellant.By the Court, Badt, J. On the wife's appeal, the court affirmed the divorce and reversed the denial of alimony. The husband was granted a divorce on the ground of three years' separation without cohabitation (NRS…
PEARSON VS. PEARSON (DIVORCE)
Feb 20, 196177 Nev. 76, 359 P.2d 386 (1961) · 4322 · Nevada Supreme Court
Reversed in part, modified in part, and otherwise affirmed. ("The judgment insofar as it appears to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law which determined that appellant was not entitled to a divorce is reversed; that part of the judgment in favor of respondent and against appellant for the sum of $30,788.44 is reversed; the security provisions of the judgment are modified so as to delete reference to the collection of $30,788.44. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.")On the husband's appeal from a judgment denying him a divorce and awarding the wife separate maintenance, the court addressed the three-year separation ground under NRS 125.010. It reaffirmed that a party seeking a…
SUTHERLAND VS. SUTHERLAND (DIVORCE)
Jun 3, 195975 Nev. 304, 340 P.2d 581 (1959) · 4151 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed. ("the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed without costs.")The court reviewed a decree of divorce granted to the husband on the ground of three consecutive years of separation without cohabitation under NRS 125.010. On domicile, the trial court's finding of the requisite…
BOZELLI VS. BOZELLI (DIVORCE)
Sep 11, 196985 Nev. 525, 458 P.2d 356 (1969) · 5775 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed.Ray obtained a divorce on the ground of one year's separation without cohabitation under NRS 125.010(9), effective July 1, 1967. The action was commenced March 30, 1967, before the amendment reducing the required…
Every summary is independently verified against the source opinion; summaries are informational research aids, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision. Topic groupings are derived automatically from each case’s category tag and cited statutes; a case may appear under two topics.